« Anti-Semitism In Turkey: Myths and Facts (I) | Main | The Islamic Spider, The Conspiracy and Me »

February 14, 2009

Anti-Semitism in Turkey: Myths and Facts (II)

[Originally published in Hürriyet Daily News]

During the final decades of the Ottoman Empire, three different solutions were devised by statesmen and intellectuals in order to save the sinking boat: Ottomanism, Islamism, and Turkism.

The first one was also the earliest, which started with the Reform Edict of 1839. It was a reaction to the winds of modern nationalism that started to influence the Christian nations of the empire such as the Greeks, Serbs, or Bulgarians. "If we emphasize the equality and civil rights of all our citizens," the Ottoman elite thought, "then we can keep them from revolting against us."

But when Ottomanism proved not to be that attractive to the Christian peoples of the Empire, Islamism became more popular. Here the idea was to emphasize brotherhood between the Muslim elements such as Turks, Arabs, Kurds, Albanians, Circassians, etc. Its champion was Sultan Abdülhamid II, who ruled from 1876 to 1909.




The rise of Turkism



And Turkism came to stage at the turn of the century, as an ideology promoted by a group of secularized Young Turks. They had lost faith in all non-Turkish elements of the Empire, so they put "Turkishness" to the center of their political agenda. As you can guess, this third line, Turkism, triumphed at the end and became the official ideology of the Turkish Republic, which was created from the ashes of the Ottoman Empire in 1923.

In fact, the populace that remained in the borders of Turkey was not fully Turkish, so the Turkish Republic decided to engage in a long-term social engineering to fix this "problem." There were two tandem strategies: All non-Turkish Muslims, such as Kurds, would be "Turkified." All-non Muslims, such as Greeks, Armenians and Jews, would be defined as "minorities," who were perceived as "foreigners" that have the potential to be fifth columns for "foreign powers."

That's why the very foundational idea of the Turkish Republic included the potential to breed anti-Semitism. That potential turned into malicious action in the 30's and early 40's, when both the ideology and the "efficiency" of Nazi Germany found sympathizers among Kemalists such as Recep Peker, the "third man" of the "single party" regime.

The first malicious action was the pogroms in Trace, Turkey's Western edge, that took place in 1934. The 45-thousand strong Jewish community became the target of plundering masses who were provoked by the notorious Turkish anti-Semite Cevat Rıfat Atilhan. The Kemalist government stopped the violence only very late, leading to comments that it was content with what was going on. The culprits were not punished, and Atilhan went on writing anti-Semitic bilge. One of his books was titled, "Oh, Son of Turk, Know Thy Enemy!" The enemy was "international Jewry."

The second and even worse malicious action was the Wealth Tax of 1942, which was a very heavy burden levied on the wealthy citizens, which especially included Jews and even Jewish converts. 2,000 of them, who could not pay the enormous amount demanded for this sudden tax, were arrested and sent to a forced labor camp in eastern Turkey. 21 of them died there.

When it became obvious that the Allies would win the war, though, the policy suddenly shifted, the Wealth Tax was abolished, and a group of extreme Turkist ideologues were arrested. It was time to play Mr. Nice Guy. But the hidden suspicion toward the Jews and other non-Muslim minorities remained deep-seated in Kemalist Ankara. That's why you can see them at any high position in bureaucracy.

All this history should explain us why anti-Semitism in Turkey is strong among secular nationalists -- since the early Turkists to the latter day "ulusalcı"s such as the members or sympathizers of the notorious Ergenekon network.


Islamic side of the coin

Of course, there is anti-Semitism on the Islamic camp as well. But here, there is a curious nuance. The Islamic communities in Turkey who trace their heritage to the Ottoman Empire have almost never sympathized with anti-Semitism. The "Nurcu"s and their modern off-shoot, the Fethullah Gülen community, for example, have rather emphasized "Ottoman tolerance" and even engaged in inter-faith dialogue with Jews, both at home and abroad. It is a line in parallel with their support to the democratization process, and, more lately, the EU membership.

Yet even this mild form of civic Islam is too much for Turkey's draconian secularism, and thus it has been suppressed since the beginning of the republic.

Soon, the vacuum was filled by a more radical and fuming form of Islamic thought that evolved in the Middle East. Starting from the late 60's, a new generation of Islamists arose whose source of inspiration was not Ottoman thinkers and Anatolian Sufis, but rather theorists of hardcore Islamism such as Sayyid Qutb of Egypt or Abul A'ala Maududi of Pakistan. No wonder today anti-Semitic Muslims in Turkey are the ones who are inspired by this imported radical Islamism. Notably they sometimes accuse the more native, home-grown and moderate Islamic circles as cowards or traitors who have accepted "the system of the unbelievers."

The liberation of Turkey, of course, lies in accepting that very "system," i.e., liberal democracy, which comes from not "the unbelievers," but universal values such as human dignity, equality and freedom. That is the national way to go. We just should be careful to note that the challenges do, and will, come from both the secular and the Islamic camps.

Posted by Mustafa Akyol at February 14, 2009 2:15 AM

Comments

(Note: Comments on articles do not necessarily reflect Mustafa Akyol's views. The fact that particular comments remain on the site does not imply any endorsement by Mustafa Akyol of the views expressed therein. Comments that are off-topic or offensive may be summarily deleted. )

Haruki Murakami's quote while looking at shimon peres:

"Between a high, solid wall and an egg that breaks against it, I will always stand on the side of the egg."

What is the meaning of this metaphor? In some cases, it is all too simple and clear. Bombers and tanks and rockets and white phosphorus shells are that high, solid wall. The eggs are the unarmed civilians who are crushed and burned and shot by them. This is one meaning of the metaphor.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1064909.html

Posted by: Behruz Himo at February 17, 2009 3:23 PM

Strange, I’d much rather be on the wall’s side than the egg.

But is there not something about *always* choosing the wall over the egg. Sometimes the wall is the one, who is in the right, and the egg is wicked, or the good guys would always lose.

Take the USA civil was for example. The north was a wall, with more industrial production in a single city, New York, than in the entire South. The South was the egg, with much of the population reduced to poverty after the war. But its hard to have too much sympathy for a people who lived by wringing the bread from the sweat of another man’s brow.

Posted by: Taken at February 19, 2009 8:27 PM

Please look at this pictures, compiled by son of Holocaust survivors, ONE BY ONE and tell YOURSELF who is "wicked"

http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=11&ar=2510

Call to every person of conscious please forward this pictures and Prof. Norman Finkelsteins' link to as many people as you can.

Peace,

Behruz.

Posted by: Behruz Himo at February 20, 2009 10:06 AM

I was just talking generally; because the original link you provided stated the writer would *always* side with the egg, which I took to mean not just in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, but in all asymmetrical conflicts. That's just bizzare.


Anyway, I will forward the pictures you posted.


Taken

Posted by: Taken at February 22, 2009 2:45 AM

"Anyway, I will forward the pictures you posted."

Please do so. Thank you!

Posted by: Behruz Himo at February 24, 2009 11:48 AM

This article does not make sense. Islamists are the ones who spout anti-Semitism. It even goes as far as calling Ataturk a Zionist, or a crypto-Jew. Really, the mind boggles!

Secularism goes hand in hand with liberal democracy.

Posted by: emre at March 25, 2009 3:37 AM

emre wrote:
Secularism goes hand in hand with liberal democracy.

Unfortunately not in turkey.
In turkey secularism is an excuse to protect the elite and corruption. It takes the bare bones of the democratic ideology and sets up a system around it to punish any dissent or evolution to the ideology.

Posted by: kenan at May 6, 2009 6:29 AM

Post a comment





(you may use HTML tags for style)