« The Koran and Non-Muslims—Facts Versus Myths | Main | Abdullah Gül, a Muslim Modernizer »

September 6, 2007

An Open Letter to the Turkish Military

[Originally published in Turkish Daily News]

Dear generals,

We Turks have been through quite a political turmoil in the past five months, which escalated especially with your famous “secularism warning” that appeared on your official Web site on the night of Apr. 27. Since then, Turkey had a very tense and nervous election campaign, held a very popular election, and elected a new president. The widespread hope is that we have come out of the crisis, have passed the political bottleneck, and are heading toward a more normal period. I very much share that optimism, but I also think that we have to reflect on what just happened in our country, and draw some lessons.

Moreover, I think we can't do that unless we engage in a mutually respectful dialogue. That's why, as a concerned citizen, I wanted to share with you my humble views about the role of your institution in our country.


Don't Be A Player In Politics

First of all I should say that, like virtually all Turks, I am proud to have a strong military that supports our nation against potential threats. We live in a dangerous neighborhood, and it is a must to have a stalwart, well disciplined and brave Armed Forces like the one you command. There is no question about that. However there are some questions about your role in Turkey's internal politics. There is a widespread opinion in this country, and in the world, that you are a player in our nation's political matters, and that you take sides between different political views and parties. The prevalent rumor is that you especially don't like the incumbent Justice and Development Party (AKP), and our new president, Mr. Abdullah Gül.

With all due respect, I think that perception – whether it corresponds to reality or not – is very harmful to our nation. Because when you are perceived to take sides between different political views and parties, you also unavoidably seem to favor some citizens against others – and not just their political lines, but their beliefs and lifestyles. For example, when you don't allow the citizens who wear the headscarf to enter your buildings and zones, or when you avoid welcoming our new first lady who wears the headscarf, you seem to be discriminating against a particular segment of our society. Forgive me to use the “D” word, but this simply looks divisive.

Please note that you are the Armed Forces of all citizens of Turkey, and all of them need to trust you. And, despite all the troubles, they actually do. They all pay taxes, and that's the basic financial support for our army, navy and air force. They all send their sons to serve in the military, and, if necessary, to die for the defense of the homeland. When their children are killed in combat, they all say, “Let the homeland be safe.” Wouldn't it be bad to make these people think that they are deemed as second-class citizens by the very state for which they sacrifice their sons.


Principles and Interpretations

I know that you actually don't want to interfere with politics, but you only want to preserve the founding principles of our republic, such as secularism or nationalism. That's what you repeatedly emphasize. But please let me point to a crucial nuance here. The founding principles of our republic have different interpretations, and what you do is, unfortunately, is support only one version among these, which most of the time roughly corresponds to the ideology of the Republican People's Party, the CHP.

Take secularism, for example. This is something that we imported from the West, and there are different versions of it. The secularism of the United States, for example, places much more emphasis on religious freedom than ours does. That's why a headscarf ban would be unthinkable in America. So, it is wrong to think that wider religious freedoms – something demanded by the AKP electorate – will diminish our secularism. It might even embolden it by making it more acceptable to observant believers.

Different interpretations of nationalism are possible, too. Atatürk's nationalism is based on his famous motto, “How happy is the one who says ‘I am a Turk,'” right? Good. But does this mean that the citizens are not supposed to speak Kurdish although that might be their mother tongue? We have thought so since the ‘20s, and thus have banned Kurdish language and culture for so many decades. (And it is no secret that your predecessors have been strong supporters of that “no Kurdish allowed” policy.) However, suppression did not bring the assimilation that we hoped for. It rather created a backlash among the Kurdish citizens, and that's where the PKK terrorism arose from.


Drawing Lessons from Our Mistakes

So, don't you think that we should draw some lessons from our mistakes on the Kurdish question? I do draw one, and it is this: Turkish society is much more diverse than our official rhetoric has traditionally acknowledged, and it is getting even more colorful as Turkey modernizes. The only way to avoid internal conflicts is to appreciate our diversity. Some citizens wear headscarves, others prefer mini skirts. Some are Kurds who are proud of their identity, some are Turkish nationalists who cherish their ethnic roots in Central Asia. If we don't accept a live-and-let-live approach, we will never find peace of mind. And we will never be able to nurture that approach, if you and other state institutions seem to favor some citizens at the expense of others.

Excuse me if I am sounding a bit prig with all this, but I think I am not too unreasonable, and I was recently heartened by a brilliant speech given by one of yours, Gen. Faruk Cömert, the commander of the Air Force. “When we try to understand each other instead of suspecting, and when we mobilize our dynamism that comes from the diversity of our ideas,” Gen. Cömert said, “we will overcome our problems.” He added that our goal should be “the strengthening of our democratic maturity.” That was the best message I have heard these days.

I very much hope that this democratic vision will be the guide for our military in the years to come. Atatürk's hope was to build a modern nation, and if there is one single cornerstone of modernity, that is democracy. Democracy means that ideas and lifestyles that we don't like should have their valid space in public life. And if their representatives are democratically elected, all civil servants should accept their authority.

That's why I hope to see gestures from you nowadays which will show that you genuinely accept and respect our new president and the first lady. I know that there are many undemocratic-minded politicians and pundits who call on you to do otherwise, and constantly try to drag you into politics to support their side. Please ignore them. It is time for them to grow up and learn to defend their views without leaning on the barrels of your guns. And, alas, it is time for our country to become a real democracy.

Mustafa Akyol

A citizen

Posted by Mustafa Akyol at September 6, 2007 9:21 AM

Comments

(Note: Comments on articles do not necessarily reflect Mustafa Akyol's views. The fact that particular comments remain on the site does not imply any endorsement by Mustafa Akyol of the views expressed therein. Comments that are off-topic or offensive may be summarily deleted. )

Well said Mustafa.
that makes us two...

Posted by: Guven at September 6, 2007 2:41 PM

Dear Mustafa,

I haven't really been a fan of yours in the past, but this open letter is superb and should rattle the sabers of those in uniform.

Although, I still disagree with the way the president is elected and believe that he will be just a puppet and not really the "people's" president. But, I still worry about the rising fundamentalism that is all around us. As a foreigner working with young people, the religiousity and nationalism is all too apparent.

Please continue this dialogue.

Posted by: istanbulexpat at September 6, 2007 8:05 PM

I think the letter doesn't go far enough.

How about suggesting some 'forced' early retirement for the aged.

:)

Posted by: metin at September 7, 2007 5:41 PM

It is important to note a few things regarding a possible military intervention.

Let’s imagine the worst possible political scenario for present day Turkey. The secularists, particularly those of the military, finally accept that they are a minority. Like all minorities, it cannot impose its view on the majority. Of course this would have largely been to the intellectual inferiority of the secularist argument which resorts to fictitious scare mongering rather that factual debate.

The acceptance of the minority status still does not push them to accept the will of the majority. It simply tells them that the people no longer fall for all the ‘republic’ rhetoric which has been used to disguise the elitist struggle to maintain power. This is Turkey, so best believe this minority will convince themselves that the majority are in fact senseless and once again, they need a bit of ‘push and shove’ to tame their political aspirations leaving more room to the status quo.

So the top generals give out the orders. All governmental buildings to be took over as well as political parties. Tanks are on the street. Guns are being held against civilians. Baykal or some other power thirsty ignorant secularist bigot is put in power. Turkey, like so many times before, heads back to 1920’s but with a self-righteous minority convinced that they just guarded the good old republic. The population returns to being scared of being free men and women, fully enjoying their democratic rights because if they do, many will be arrested, of which some will never survive. Turkey during coups is a place of nightmares.

I don’t believe in the likelihood of this though because the commanders know the following:.

If the generals give out orders, who will obey them? Turkey is tired of coups. Even many military officers have called for dialogue and understanding, You can count a few corrupt secularist officers but are they really that many? We obey our orders as soldiers but in actions against such a significant majority?

The military expels religious minded, or rather non-secularist minded officers on a regular basis. Have they expelled all of them? I don’t think so. Despite the brainwashing we receive during our military service, they cannot change us and this frustrates them immensely.

I love the TSK but the commanders should know their place and who they answer to. They answer to President Gul, who in turn answers to us.

My advice to the military is just to be the greatest military of the world, not the CHP’s political militia. Because if you finally decide to be the CHP militia, you will have a civil war on your hands. Many of us have already been soldiers and have family in the present TSK. Please don’t ever forget that the TSK is made up by the same people you are trying to repress.

Look what happened with President Chavez in Venezuela. The military tried to remove from power this extremely popular leader. It ultimately failed due to the lower ranking officers and soldiers refusing to carry out anti-democratic instruction. I hope ours would do the same if the secularist actually physically challenge our democracy.
I will never come to that inshallah.

Posted by: Ceyhan at September 24, 2007 3:47 PM

Post a comment





(you may use HTML tags for style)