« The Secularist Hype in Turkey Is a Fact-Free Paranoia | Main | The Latest Jewish Conspiracy: 'Moderate Islam' & AKP »
May 4, 2007
The Threat Is Secular Fundamentalism
[Originally published in International Herald Tribune]
It is no secret that Islamic fundamentalism is a threat to democracy, freedom and security in today's world, especially in the Middle East. Yet the same values can be threatened by secular fundamentalists, too. Turkey's self-styled laïcité, a much more radical version of the French secular system, is a case in point.
The American model of secularism guarantees individual religious liberty. The Turkish model, however, guarantees the state's right to dominate religion and suppress religious practice in any way it deems necessary.
This devolves from the veneration of the state as an end in itself, an entity to which all other values may - and must - be sacrificed. Mingled with this is the hostility felt by the Turkish secularist elite toward religion generally. Influenced by the European anti-religious movements of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it views religion as a pre-modern myth, one that must be extinguished for modernity to blossom.
The outcome of this mindset is an authoritarian strategy: Political power is to remain in the hands of the secularist elite. Thus the "secular republic" equals the "republic of seculars" - not the republic of all citizens.
Moreover, the secular elite holds itself responsible for preventing religion from flourishing; it is the proper role of the state, they believe, to suppress religious communities, restrict religious education and ban visible signs of observance such as the head scarf.
The secularist program functioned smoothly in the second quarter of the 20th century, during which Turkey lived under a euphemistic "single party regime." But after World War II, the secularist elite was forced to accept a disagreeable inconvenience - democracy.
Since 1950, almost every election has been won by center-right parties, which have advocated relative religious freedom. More recently, Islamist parties have risen in popularity.
A liberal offshoot of these parties, the Justice and Development party, known by its Turkish initials as the AK party, came to power in 2002 by rejecting its Islamist past and defining itself as "conservative."
The AK party's evolution is an interesting story. Islamic circles in Turkey have long hoped for a return to the glorious Ottoman and Islamic past in order to rid themselves of the ruling autocracy, which they regarded as the West's evil gift.
However, since the 1980s, thanks to their growing interaction with the rest of the world, they have come to realize something significant: The West is better than the Westernizers.
Noting that Western democracies give their citizens the very religious freedoms Turkey has denied its own, Muslims of the AK party have rerouted their search for freedom. Rather than trying to Islamize the state, they have decided to liberalize it. That's why in today's Turkey the AK party is the main proponent of the effort to join the European Union, democratization, free markets and individual liberties.
For the same reason, there are many secular liberals (including some atheists and agnostics) who sympathize with the AK party government led by Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan.
Interestingly, this has led the party's secularist opponents to embrace fierce anti-Westernism. Most ultra-secular pundits speculate about "the alliance between moderate Islam and American imperialism" - and they despise both.
In recent rallies in Ankara and Istanbul, secularist protesters denounced Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul, the AK party's candidate for president, with a pun: "We want no ABD-ullah as president," their posters read. "ABD" is the Turkish equivalent of "USA." In other words, they were calling Gul "USA-ullah."
This anti-Western, anti-religious and anti-liberal ideology lies beneath the current ultra-secularist hype in Turkey.
Adherents accuse the AK party government of using salami tactics to usher in "sharia rule," but the evidence for this is hardly convincing.
They point to the endorsement of peaceful religious practices, the appointment of observant people to the bureaucracy (which has been a bastion of secularists) and the possibility that the country's first lady might wear the hated head scarf.
The Turkish military issued a harsh warning about the threat to secularism on April 27, pointing to the shocking evidence of rising religious fanaticism: Two groups of schoolgirls had been sighted covering their heads and singing a hymn praising the Prophet Muhammad. Needless to say, had this highly alarming spectacle taken place in the free world, no one would have raised an eyebrow.
It is true that Turkey's Islamic circles need further modernization, but studies show that they are already on that track. And whatever Turkey's problems, it should never retreat from democracy. The Western world should support the country's efforts in that direction.
The ultimate solution, of course, will come when we Turks understand that all citizens - whether they wear a head scarf, cross or miniskirt - are equals. Our over-susceptible republic will be much more secure and relieved when it treats them as such.
Posted by Mustafa Akyol at May 4, 2007 5:30 PM


"Two groups of schoolgirls had been sighted covering their heads and singing a hymn praising the Prophet Muhammad. Needless to say, had this highly alarming spectacle taken place in the free world, no one would have raised an eyebrow."
Really? As far as I remembered the movie "Jesus Camp" become an sensation in the free world?
Even though I hardly agree with most of Mr.Akyol's argumentations (usually filled with over simplifications and fallacies) I have to agree with his following statement:
"The ultimate solution, of course, will come when we Turks understand that all citizens - whether they wear a head scarf, cross or miniskirt - are equals."
However, I believe that the days that Kemalists leaves girls with headscarves alone are much closer (within a coupel of years) than the days that Islamists let girls with mini-skirts alone (decades?).
The threat is not individuals who exercise their religious beliefs but the Islamic fraternities (Gulen movement being one of them) which interfere with individuals' freedoms.
Posted by: nyoped at December 22, 2008 7:20 AM
Nyoped is absolutely right. The real threat is the uncontrollable religious orders/movements/fraternities who convert their believers to "modern day slaves" by overwhelming them in a network of social, political and economic institutions with undeniable incentive structures. This sinister abuse must stop.
Posted by: cingoz at December 26, 2008 12:42 AM
Still M.Akyol defend an interesting position.
Surely that there is a lot of christians messianists movements and Islam change a lot those time. But still.
I like the point of a religion defending liberal positions. that is what many christians showed to be the opposite of fascism paganism, who is leading the biggest of all the offensive now. (for example Gary North - Moses and Pharaoh, tough i don't agree -at all- with his conclusions)
It should be understand that the real ennemy of monotheism is New Age paganism revival. This one is using the spiritual, ecologic and economic crisis as an opportunity to push their pions. Such as holism, gaia theory, over-regulation of all aspect of life. New Age is behind the coming back of heavy moralism and behaviorism now.
Theosophy and Fabians are two aspect of this offensive. Theosophy lead in other time to the national-socialist spirituality, and was part of its antisemitism. This lead to the crushing of jews. But many christians died too.
And now it seems that they're going against muslims. At least against the ones they call "fundamentalist", which means the ones who won't reject their faith for a more this-wordly theology. That is what was the church struggle in the third Reich. A lot of collaborationist, but some resistant who choosed to come back to the transcendence of Scripture. Because Scripture truth, and kalimat Allah, was their only defense against the over leading immanence of national-socialism. (see "Modern fascism : liquidating the judeo-christian worldview")
Of course New Age come inside christianity, and very surely inside Islam too. But this kind of people would never defend a liberal islam as M. Akyol does.
What people have difficulties to understand is that all believers are to be crushed by the next offensive. Whether jew, christian or muslim, we begin to upset so much this world that he will get ride of us. Quran does not allow us to ally with them. Doesn't we have a duty of protecting them ?
The Threat Is Secular Fundamentalism, yes. But the spirituality that comes in his bags is
definitely not secular. The threat is New Age revival.
PS : I don't see the point of the girls. Of course muslims will never accept occidental decadence, and secularist will never accept the hijab. We don't live according to same rules. So what ?
Posted by: Salamat at June 5, 2009 6:04 PM